Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

I think that one particular subsection deserves a lot more attention:

https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/senate-bill/686...

>(2) INAPPLICABILITY OF FOIA.—Any information submitted to the Federal Government by a party to a covered transaction in accordance with this Act, as well as any information the Federal Government may create relating to review of the covered transaction, is exempt from disclosure under section 552 of title 5, United States Code (commonly referred to as the “Freedom of Information Act”).




https://www.foia.gov/faq.html

    Not all records are required to be released under the FOIA. Congress established nine exemptions from disclosure for certain categories of information to protect against certain harms, such as an invasion of personal privacy, or harm to law enforcement investigations. The FOIA authorizes agencies to withhold information when they reasonably foresee that disclosure would harm an interest protected by one of these nine exemptions.


    Exemption 1: Information that is classified to protect national security.
    Exemption 2: Information related solely to the internal personnel rules and practices of an agency.
    Exemption 3: Information that is prohibited from disclosure by another federal law.
    Exemption 4: Trade secrets or commercial or financial information that is confidential or privileged.
    Exemption 5: Privileged communications within or between agencies, including those protected by the:
        Deliberative Process Privilege (provided the records were created less than 25 years before the date on which they were requested)
        Attorney-Work Product Privilege
        Attorney-Client Privilege
    Exemption 6: Information that, if disclosed, would invade another individual’s personal privacy.
    Exemption 7: Information compiled for law enforcement purposes that:
        7(A). Could reasonably be expected to interfere with enforcement proceedings
        7(B). Would deprive a person of a right to a fair trial or an impartial adjudication
        7(C). Could reasonably be expected to constitute an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy
        7(D). Could reasonably be expected to disclose the identity of a confidential source
        7(E). Would disclose techniques and procedures for law enforcement investigations or prosecutions, or would disclose guidelines for law enforcement investigations or prosecutions if such disclosure could reasonably be expected to risk circumvention of the law
        7(F). Could reasonably be expected to endanger the life or physical safety of any individual
    Exemption 8: Information that concerns the supervision of financial institutions.
    Exemption 9: Geological information on wells.
While this is stating that it clearly falls under exemption 3 without any interpretation needed, the various parts of exemption 7 may also apply (consider the question of if a Chinese national provided the information - would it fall under 7F?)




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: