Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> We block ChatGPT, as do most federal contractors. I think it’s a horrible exploit waiting to happen:

Do you also block pastebin? Anything else that has a web form? How is ChatGPT special compared to any other service on the Internet where people can paste data in a form?

I mean... I see the problem, but I think one needs to realize that it's a far more generic problem that has basically nothing to do with ChatGPT and AI. If people paste confidential data into random webpages that's of course bad. But if you block ChatGPT because you fear that, it means you expect that people might do that. And then your problem is not ChatGPT, but lack of awareness what is confidential data and what to do with it.



> Do you also block pastebin? Anything else that has a web form?

pastebin and indeed most things that has some sort of public webform is blocked in all the companies I have worked with.

It is probably a losing battle though, as it is very hard to block everything without default deny.

Paradoxically, maybe GPT could be used to veto websites on first access :)


> pastebin and indeed most things that has some sort of public webform is blocked in all the companies I have worked with.

Search engines too? And these days, that means web browsers, because the (IMHO stupid) idea of combining address and search bars into one means everything you type while trying to open a website gets leaked to some party (most likely Google).


Search engines (and url bars) are indeed not blocked, but I do worry every time I use them. Internal url leaks to google must be extremely common.


I imagine they must be. I'm habitually careful to either click on a link, paste the entirety of the internal URL at once, or enter only the most generic word or words that will surface the URL I want as a history suggestion - all to minimize the chances of leaking anything this way.


You can turn the auto search off


There's a lot of things that you can turn off, but nobody actually does - which is the very reason they ship turned on in the first place.


Because "awareness only" has such a great track record when it comes to security-adjacent issues, and totally satisfies auditors/customers/regulators/...?


I don't think awareness only has any reasonable track record and I would always prefer a technical control if there is one. But I have a hard time seeing any alternative here.

I don't think the idea that you can give people access to the www and at the same time preventing them from putting things in forms can be done. That's simply not how it works. And if you're blocking access to a few services where they might do that, well, they have a million others, and you're deceiving yourself that you've done something.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: