This is a weird article. It starts like a news report, then suddenly reads like a rumor based on insider info ("Moreover, I’ve been warned that..."), and then ends like an opinion piece "Apple’s structure itself is a source of stress". Also, who is the author?
> Most of these people carried the title of vice president, which is just below the senior vice president level that reports to Chief Executive Officer Tim Cook.
That's one of those "technically true" facts that doesn't say much.
I don't work at Apple, but while VP at BigTech is a BIG DEAL, we're still talking about a scenario where there are maybe ~10 Senior Vice Presidents, and probably ~200 regular Vice Presidents.
I guess this will be a test of whether the Apple University [1] (to propagate the values of the company for new execs) can keep the culture alive through succession.
Apple doesn't seem to have a vision for the future. Elon is working on global energy sustainability, self-driving cars, underground tunnels, global internet, reusable rockets, neuralink, free speech, etc... Apple was rumoured to be working on a car... now a VR headset... It feels gimmicky. It feels like: "let's wait to see what becomes popular and then copy it".
"Where there is no vision, the people perish" - Proverbs 29:18
Elon Musk's idea of "working on free speech" seems to be limited to "let's unban a bunch of neo-Nazis and antisemites, most notably Kanye West, and tank the value of Twitter and Tesla in the process".
You're spot-on with Apple - but on the other side, maybe it's not bad to have an example of a company that is fine existing as it is and not needing to participate in the destructive pseudo-innovatism race that has led to shit like thousands of altcoin scams/"Web3".