Not ex ante. That’s the strength of common law. If you have a problem with this, consider why we need laws which define womanhood. (Yes, I am an ERA proponent.)
An ERA proponent is in reference to an Equal Rights Amendment?
I don’t. And I’m struggling to play devil’s advocate, which is uncommon.
> ERA proponent is in reference to an Equal Rights Amendment
Yes.
Not ex ante. That’s the strength of common law. If you have a problem with this, consider why we need laws which define womanhood. (Yes, I am an ERA proponent.)