Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I don't know if you've noticed my previous comment already said D's GC is optional?

To me optional GC is a major downside. Because the option to use the GC exists, I don't believe that the language and the library ecosystem will have first-class support for the no-GC users. For example, DUB's website doesn't have an option to search only for no-GC packages. I don't want to be restricted to the worse half of the language.

Doing everything that C++ can do is not a reason to switch away from C++. C++ can already do everything that C++ can do.

D has some nicer syntax, and neat little features like universal function/method call syntax, unittest blocks. But I can't go to my boss and say "Hey, we should rewrite our product in D. Why? Because the unittest block is a really cool idea".



> Why? Because the unittest block is a really cool idea".

Indeed, you should not change languages based on only one thing. It's also pedantically true that one can do anything in any Turing-complete language.

A much more interesting point is how productive one can be in different languages.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: