>Reading this article, he's making a great argument for Rust.
I think his points are related to an approach which generally reduces complexity and errors. Parts of that philosophy are embodied by Rust but are not exclusive to it.
I also don't know if Rust aligns well with the goal of reducing complexity. Programming in Rust gets really bogged down into thinking about programming language abstractions rather solving whatever problem you need to solve.
I think his points are related to an approach which generally reduces complexity and errors. Parts of that philosophy are embodied by Rust but are not exclusive to it.