> Making things very expensive is precisely how to motivate people to innovate.
I don't think that is the best way to innovate. The ability to make money is the best way.
> that you're pointedly ignoring.
I don't really understand the mentality of someone who would write this, as though someone can ignore something in piecemeal asynchronous communication.
I also don't understand the archaic phrasing, and while I feel I shouldn't have to say this, but I am not at an 18th century finishing school and you are not my headmistress.
Again, don't be a libertarian, and get help. You don't have to do this alone.
Do you really mean to ignore or dismiss the relationship between "ability to make money" and "things becoming more expensive"? That's not going to work here. Raise your game.
> Making things very expensive is precisely how to motivate people to innovate.
I don't think that is the best way to innovate. The ability to make money is the best way.
> that you're pointedly ignoring.
I don't really understand the mentality of someone who would write this, as though someone can ignore something in piecemeal asynchronous communication.
I also don't understand the archaic phrasing, and while I feel I shouldn't have to say this, but I am not at an 18th century finishing school and you are not my headmistress.
Again, don't be a libertarian, and get help. You don't have to do this alone.