Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

They are not the same at all, so your statement is incorrect.


I don't see your argument here. Is your objection solely that I was insufficiently restrictive in my statement?

addendum: You're saying your analogy is fallacious, therefore I'm incorrect. Which I find rather confusing.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: