Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Super excited and wait-listed. ChatGPT is likely to be the future - at least for certain applications - and I want to support it getting there.

I had a conversation with a friend about how much I would pay for this service and $20 is only a little more expensive than my response at the time. I think it will improve massively over time, and I'm here for it.

The current product is lacking a bit and can feel a bit hand-holdy when asking controversial questions, but that's probably good, considering the damage simple bots on social media can do to democracy. If the hand-holding allows me to get concise (if sometimes inaccurate) and fast answers to questions you can't ask a traditional search engine, it's worth a lot. It will be worth even more when it can provide sources for answers, or references to where the answers have been synthesized from.



They should just build in Asimov’s rules, and perhaps some extra ones to keep lawyers pleased. But only the minimum possible.


Asimov's rules are not nearly comprehensive enough for a number of reasons. Don't forget they were written to tell a fictiona story, not as practical advice.

AI alignment is a hard problem.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: