> I always wondered if pharmacists had any specific training in the terrible handwriting doctors put on prescriptions
One day my local pharmacist was in a chatty mood whilst filling my request and one topic that came up was doctor's handwriting.
The answer is yes, they do (did ?) receive training in handwriting recognition.
Basically it involves learning to recognise common abbreviations and mostly being very familiar with drug names and dosing.
As the pharmacist said, when he received his training it was "easy" because the formulary was "somewhat shorter" than it is today. As a result he said his junior trainees struggle and frequently come to him guidance until they've had sufficient exposure.
However with things moving to electronic prescriptions the days of deciphering will be relic of the past for many pharmacists.
This reminded me, I once attended a lecture by a pharmacist who got interested in handwriting and showed how different conditions and medications might manifest in customers' handwriting.
Looking at the samples, it was pretty fascinating.
Since he undoubtedly read a lot of doctors' writing too, and since I personally know a doctor who abused their access to medication, I did wonder what questions this pharmacist would've had about local doctors...
One day my local pharmacist was in a chatty mood whilst filling my request and one topic that came up was doctor's handwriting.
The answer is yes, they do (did ?) receive training in handwriting recognition.
Basically it involves learning to recognise common abbreviations and mostly being very familiar with drug names and dosing.
As the pharmacist said, when he received his training it was "easy" because the formulary was "somewhat shorter" than it is today. As a result he said his junior trainees struggle and frequently come to him guidance until they've had sufficient exposure.
However with things moving to electronic prescriptions the days of deciphering will be relic of the past for many pharmacists.