> Well too bad that I don’t want to work opensource or use stack overflow (I don’t for work because we have our own internal one for years)
Then communicate that. The point in the article is just to demonstrate that you deliver consistently. If you have meaningful contributions to an internal system, tell me about it.
> whatever impact I have in the corner of a 50000 employee company is probably not going to be enough for you.
Working at a large company is definitely different than working at a small company. The breadth and depth of the job responsibilities will be different.
That’s okay. Not every job is for everyone.
> How about just checking I know what I put on the resume and being done with it
What do you mean by “check”?
Resumes are a place for the candidate to tell me about themselves, they’re not some sort of background investigation. I presume they are honest unless the candidate gives me a reason otherwise. And if the candidate gives me a reason to believe they’re not honest, I’m not wasting any time sleuthing about their background — they’re disqualified.
Then communicate that. The point in the article is just to demonstrate that you deliver consistently. If you have meaningful contributions to an internal system, tell me about it.
> whatever impact I have in the corner of a 50000 employee company is probably not going to be enough for you.
Working at a large company is definitely different than working at a small company. The breadth and depth of the job responsibilities will be different.
That’s okay. Not every job is for everyone.
> How about just checking I know what I put on the resume and being done with it
What do you mean by “check”?
Resumes are a place for the candidate to tell me about themselves, they’re not some sort of background investigation. I presume they are honest unless the candidate gives me a reason otherwise. And if the candidate gives me a reason to believe they’re not honest, I’m not wasting any time sleuthing about their background — they’re disqualified.