Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Ramping it up is likely the problem, since all plants can reduce power on a dime by just varying the generator coil current I think.

You could just keep it spinning nonstop without a load I suppose, but for anything but nuclear it's not gonna be economical.



A nuclear power plant can't just "keep spinning without a load" - all that energy has to go somewhere! If a nuclear plant is disconnected from the grid (tripped), the nuclear reaction must be stopped (eg: by inserting control rods into the core).


Of course it can, just short the generator coils and you have a free brake. The turbine should then still have resistance and shouldn't overspeed. Or just idk, use it to pump some water in a loop or discharge through some resistors. Getting rid of power isn't that hard if you want to do it. Simplest solution would I suppose be to just have an outside radiator that brings the steam to cooling tower levels of manageability so you can throttle the turbine with just a valve.

The thing is, they don't really want to do it if they can save fuel by shutting down.


> "just short the generator coils and you have a free brake"

You'll soon end up with a burning/melted generator.

> "pump some water in a loop"

OK, but you're going to need huge pumps (1000+ MW!). Expensive.

> "or discharge through some resistors"

Again, you'll need extremely large resistors, and a way to dissipate an awful lot of heat. We're talking about a huge amount of energy here!


Pump water in a loop through a radiator to cool the braking generators and the resistor bank :P

Could try also melting some salt on the side.


sadly, my searches for "gigawatt resistor" and "gigawatt electric load" have been fruitless.


try "reserve ultimate heat sink" instead of "gigawatt resistor"




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: