The point is your opinion is concordant with every other poster in this thread, aka hivemind. Note that there is no nuanced discussion on this topic, everybody has already arrived at their conclusion. Nobody is asking whether some people are fine with touchscreens in cars and why that might be the case.
> The point is your opinion is concordant with every other poster in this thread, aka hivemind
By this logic isn't everyone who is pro-touchscreens also a hivemind?
> Nobody is asking whether some people are fine with touchscreens in cars and why that might be the case.
Many people are demonstrably bad drivers who are over-confident in their ability and down-play the risk of distractions. When drunk driving was made illegal, people were furious and insisted they were fine to drive drunk and that it was perfectly safe: https://youtu.be/W_tqQYmgMQg
Touchscreens, while convenient and extensible, are demonstrably inferior to static physical controls for saftey-critical contexts.
