Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Your assumption is that the state will apply that money optimally (or at least more optimally than the super rich - also, notice you didn’t define what super rich are).

Looking at historical and present data, I can be absolutely sure that the state will mismanage that money in almost every country.

I’m Portuguese, my government is collecting more ~ 25% taxes than it collected 6 years ago when the current ruling party got into power. Almost everyone (left and right) agrees that public services and administration are much worst. So, it begs the question: why giving the government even more money, will solve anything?



To be honest I think this is strawman argument. I think it is absolutely true that the government will mismanage some of that money. The question is whether that money used with not 100% efficiency is better than a billionaire who may spend that money on anything. I certainly agree there are rich people who donate their money effectively but even then they decide what to spend the money on. So in my opinion some government mismanagement is not the reason to have some redistribution, but rather a reason to ensure that governments are properly accountable etc. And even if that is a government spending it can be still tendered to private companies depending on what's being done.


That implies that privately owned organizations manage money well, which is not the case either. The larger an organization is, the more inefficiencies it accumulates. Plus, don't forget that states usually provide a lot of subsidies to companies and also pay businesses/consultants to do some of their work.


If the state doesn't apply the money optimally, i.e. it's not doing its job, then that's the problem that needs to be fixed.




Consider applying for YC's Winter 2026 batch! Applications are open till Nov 10

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: