Yes, let the enlightened bureaucrats and their Ivy League-educated advisors make the decisions for the great unwashed masses who clearly cannot think for themselves.
The overly simplistic takes on wealth on this page and the 80%+ who don't bother to vote in the primaries when it counts makes a good case for that.
None of the proposed wealth distribution solutions on this page do anything to address the real problems of lack of housing, poor working conditions, and reducing poverty. Punishing the wealthy doesn't actually fix anything. Wealth redistribution could well be the result of implementing policies that make people's lives better. It could be they may become even wealthier. I don't care either way if the actual problems get addressed.
Nothing gets fixed by punishing the winners after the fact. The real solution is to make the conditions of winning dependent upon providing the solutions to poverty and scarcity in the first place. Which they already do a decent job of in many cases.
