>archive.is - ft, wsj, foreign affairs. Have at it! FA has specially good fare, in fact, well worth the visit to the archives.
Thanks, I'll use this.
>p.s. just read the whole thing. When did I conflate?
I'm just making conversation, it's not intended to be a debate where either side is going to be "correct" :-)
Both NYT and WaPo fail to allow true lateral thinking on their pages except for "special occasions".
>Some do however reasonably point out that power comes out of the barrel of a gun and you need money for guns ...
Power does come from the barrel of a gun, in a way, but people don't like to feel coerced. If you kill someone, their children, their parents, and their friends will be your enemies for life.
Real ultimate power comes from having untracable, encrypted communications paired with an opaque social graph, so your opponents won't know who to use that gun on other than themselves to end their sadness.
Anyways, we're far from where we started... thanks for the archive link... I will definitely use it.
Thanks, I'll use this.
>p.s. just read the whole thing. When did I conflate?
I'm just making conversation, it's not intended to be a debate where either side is going to be "correct" :-)
Both NYT and WaPo fail to allow true lateral thinking on their pages except for "special occasions".
>Some do however reasonably point out that power comes out of the barrel of a gun and you need money for guns ...
Power does come from the barrel of a gun, in a way, but people don't like to feel coerced. If you kill someone, their children, their parents, and their friends will be your enemies for life.
Real ultimate power comes from having untracable, encrypted communications paired with an opaque social graph, so your opponents won't know who to use that gun on other than themselves to end their sadness.
Anyways, we're far from where we started... thanks for the archive link... I will definitely use it.