I completely agree with this comment. It is surprising to see how well AI is able to perform in fields like art and poetry, which require creativity and nuance, especially when compared to tasks like driving which may seem more straightforward. However, this shows that AI is most effective when it is able to make mistakes and learn from them. In the case of poetry, a human can easily sift through the generated poems and pick out the good ones, but in the case of driving, mistakes can have serious consequences. This highlights the importance of considering the potential risks and limitations of AI when applying it to various tasks.
I'm assuming this comment was written by ChatGPT, am I correct? It's got quite a predictable writing style, and also your comment doesn't add anything to the original, it's just reworded
"Indeed, AI's ability to make mistakes is what makes it so useful in generative fields like art and poetry, while its lack of mistakes is what makes it essential for tasks like driving."
Do you think this could actually be more of an indictment of how derivative and formulaic most "art" is? I don't think writing a poem requires any less perfection, just that we're more accepting of shitty poetry than we are terrible drivers.
