I can't tell if the people commenting are realizing that or not. In any case AI design ... I don't know, if I was a skeptic before I'm definitely curious now.
It does make me think about the legal implications. This reminds me about the makers of the song "blurred lines" getting sued by the estate of Marvin Gaye. To listen to that song and "Got to Give It Up" by Gaye is (to my mind) acknowledge that they didn't exactly take the song with out credit buy they did (to reference the Apple v. Microsoft case) take the look and feel.
INAL so I can't square those two cases in my mind (Gaye's estate won and Apple lost) but this really suggests that:
A - copyright is idiotic on some level
B - there's going to be a lot more of that type of case
It does make me think about the legal implications. This reminds me about the makers of the song "blurred lines" getting sued by the estate of Marvin Gaye. To listen to that song and "Got to Give It Up" by Gaye is (to my mind) acknowledge that they didn't exactly take the song with out credit buy they did (to reference the Apple v. Microsoft case) take the look and feel.
INAL so I can't square those two cases in my mind (Gaye's estate won and Apple lost) but this really suggests that:
A - copyright is idiotic on some level B - there's going to be a lot more of that type of case