Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

This is an incorrect definition of relative poverty as on that basis then number of people in poverty will never change - no one interested in serious analysis would use such a definition as it is not useful.


I agree with your critique, but you still see it being used a lot. There is plenty of unserious analysis around...

The better version is people living under x% of the average living standard.


I have not seen such a definition in the wild myself.




Consider applying for YC's Winter 2026 batch! Applications are open till Nov 10

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: