> I think this would throw cold water on some feminist claims of only women get prosecuted for fraud like Elizabeth Holmes and men aren't.
I believe you're making stuff up. I went through the trouble of googling for your "only women get prosecuted for fraud" claim and if anything I found exact opposite claims.
Amusingly enough, googling for "only women get prosecuted for fraud" does return search hits on Elizabeth Holmes, but showcasing how she was the only woman prosecuted for fraud.
I feel you're either making things up just to take cheap shots at women or you misunderstood references to how Elizabeth Holmes was one of the very few women prosecuted for fraud.
I believe you're making stuff up. I went through the trouble of googling for your "only women get prosecuted for fraud" claim and if anything I found exact opposite claims.
Amusingly enough, googling for "only women get prosecuted for fraud" does return search hits on Elizabeth Holmes, but showcasing how she was the only woman prosecuted for fraud.
I feel you're either making things up just to take cheap shots at women or you misunderstood references to how Elizabeth Holmes was one of the very few women prosecuted for fraud.