Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Wouldn't this be proof that Meta is dealing with the Iranian government directly and thus violating US sanctions against Iran?


(This was originally a reply to https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32934936, which originally had a title implying that.)


Do we have any proof it's Meta doing this, as opposed to the Iranian government blocking Whatsapp within its borders?


https://twitter.com/roozbehp/status/1572841090910388225?s=46...

| As a former WhatsApp engineer, I don't think WhatsApp even has any mechanism to do such a thing. It's probably an unintended artifact of its infrastructure that the Iranian government has exploited, and knowing the WhatsApp team, they are probably already working on a fix.


It's done at an application level?


(As much as I dislike Meta —) applying foreign laws to foreign users isn't "dealing" with the Iranian government. "Dealing" in the legal sense generally requires a two-way exchange. If Iran unidirectionally imposes a regulation, that's not a deal; Meta has made no decision to enter into it.

(Reference/entry point for legal aspects about this: contracts are also invalid if they're purely unidirectional. If I remember correctly there's a LegalEagle YT video about this, but you can probably dig this up elsewhere too.)


Possibly. Sanctions law is a hot mess of sometimes contradictory exceptions. In this case, the exceptions regarding "informational materials" may apply.

https://www.lawfareblog.com/did-twitter-violate-us-sanctions...


The Berman Amendment protects transferring information to/from Iran. Blocking information seems quite the opposite.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: