Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

OK, now try Benford's law second digit with Trump PA votes and tell me what you find.


Strawman much?


My point is smoking guns can be found pointing in both directions if you look hard enough.


A smoking gun is indisputable evidence, show me indisputable evidence of widespread fraud?


I don't believe there was, my point was the statistical evidence is ambiguous at best. I should have put "smoking guns" in quotes.

https://chance.amstat.org/2022/04/benfords-law-votes/


Why even use smoking gun when that clearly means obvious irrefutable evidence, how do quotes help?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: