Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> Arguing pure hypotheticals is rarely productive.

Posing hypotheticals is exactly how to test the limits of the system. It is a key component of the legislative and law making process. The entire field of law, millions of lawyers think about hypotheticals on a daily basis to analyze, write and interpret the law. Humans have evolved to have a dedicated frontal lobe whose job is to predict hypothetical scenarios and conduct cost/benefit/planning analysis. As a software engineer, I write hypothetical inputs to create unit tests so my system doesn't break. Thinking about hypotheticals is basically fundamental to all things in life and the universe.



So that's a no, you have no examples. Got it.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: