Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Yes, I feel much safer if OpenAI and Google are the sole keepers of such technology. They have my and the publics best interest at heart.


Is this satire?


Yes


Googlers and OpenAI legitimately believe this


Sarcasm.


Let me put it this way: it's not great to live in a world where the immense majority of nukes are controlled by Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin.

But it's arguably better than living in a world where every single citizen has a nuke.

(Though the potential for harm of diffusion models is far below nuke; it's not "kill millions of people", it's "produce cheap disinformation and very convincing fake evidence to ruin someone's life")


I think that would be a tough argument to make (in regards to image generation). The same could be said of just about any computing technology. The problem is we lose out on a lot of potential good.

Either way it doesn't matter, you can't control bits like you can enriched uranium. It's just a matter of time. In the grand scheme of things Open AI will be irrelevant.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: