> But MDs don't offer clinical tests for "inflammation"
They do, in fact.
> because allopathy doesn't recognize "inflammation" as a symptom caused by our diets, or something they can prevent, beyond prescribing ibuprofen to allegedly reduce it.
Yes, it does. In fact, it's almost the opposite: medicine recognizes inflammation as a common symptom (and intermediary contributor to lots of other conditions) with many causes and contributions, and the tests for inflammation don’t distinguish between causes, or even between the broad categories of chronic and acute inflammation, and therefore are only viewed as having particular marginal benefit in certain circumstances. OTOH, they are indicated when certain symptom clusters appear, or as part of a regime of monitoring inflammatory conditions.
Rheumatologists in particular care deeply about inflammation markers in both blood and imaging. Unfortunately the presence of inflammation doesn’t always pinpoint which rheumatic condition (if any) you have. But gastroenterologists and even ophthalmologists use these markers in making diagnoses.
They do, in fact.
> because allopathy doesn't recognize "inflammation" as a symptom caused by our diets, or something they can prevent, beyond prescribing ibuprofen to allegedly reduce it.
Yes, it does. In fact, it's almost the opposite: medicine recognizes inflammation as a common symptom (and intermediary contributor to lots of other conditions) with many causes and contributions, and the tests for inflammation don’t distinguish between causes, or even between the broad categories of chronic and acute inflammation, and therefore are only viewed as having particular marginal benefit in certain circumstances. OTOH, they are indicated when certain symptom clusters appear, or as part of a regime of monitoring inflammatory conditions.