Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

The entire Great Lakes region is decently densely populated.

- Columbus - Cleveland 142 miles

- Columbus - Cincinnati 106 miles

- Cleveland - Pittsburgh 134 miles

- Cleveland - Toledo 114 miles

- Columbus - Toledo 142 miles

- Toledo - Detroit 58 miles (Cleveland, Columbus, & Cincinnati can share this)

- Toledo - Chicago 244 miles (Cleveland, Columbus, Cincinnati, & Detroit can share this)

Theoretically, you can connect Chicago, Detroit, Cleveland, Columbus, Cincinnati, & Pittsburgh into <3 hr trips by HSR.

That's going to beat flying. And that connects about:

- Chicago 9.5M

- Detroit 4.5M

- Pittsburgh 2.3M

- Cincinatti 2.3M

- Columbus 2.2M

- Cleveland 2.1M

- TOTAL = 23M+ people (~7% of the US)

For 940 miles of rail...

Even considering that HSR costs ~$100M per mile - that's about $4k per person.

That sounds like a lot. But since we have frequent opportunities to finance 30-year treasuries at ~1.5% interest and the Fed mandates inflation to be ~2% or higher:

=PMT(-0.005/12, 30*12, -4000)

That's about ~$10.30 per month per person. Considering the average tax payer is paying ~$1,300 per month in federal taxes - 0.7% of that going to HSR where it makes sense - does not seem like a terrible idea...

For context, highways cost about ~$200B per year - which comes down to ~$49.75 per tax payer per month - however, only about 1/4th of that is Federal taxes (~$12.43).

I'll also add that the Great Lakes is probably at the bottom of the list of regions where HSR would make sense. Other places like the Northeast make much more sense.



Indianapolis connects all these cities already (and with rail to some of them)... 2.8M




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: