Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> How exactly do you infer that?

1. You show that you care about tradition. And you show not a slightest attempt to care about people. Words reflect mind. Not perfectly, but there is one more consideration:

2. I heard a lot from privileged. I said some of that talk myself, and I know how mind must work to say it. I changed myself and rejected my priviledge, my mind works in different ways. I do not belive my reasons to do something anymore, I have found then the only sensible way to judge my inclination to discriminate is to assess my actions and their consequences. In my previous conment I applied the technique to your actions as you described them. It is possible that you lied, but I believe it is unlikely.

> What I don’t care much for is rank identity politics disguised as benevolent activism spewed from a non-existent moral high ground.

You are angry, Jupiter, therefore you are wrong.

When you switch to an emotional talk, it seems to me to be an additional bit of evidence, that you are lying to yourself about how you care about people and discrimination. It is a very predictable reaction.



> You show that you care about tradition.

“Caring” about tradition (whatever that means) is equivalent to being complicit in social ills. Ok got it.


> Ok got it.

No you didn't.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: