Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Doesn’t answer the question. Rephrased: Why was the patent granted if prior art existed from the 70s?



The patent approval process isn't perfect. Had you violated the patent, and had Google sued you, you could always argue prior art. What would your evidence be?


As I understand it it's much harder and more expensive to win a prior art claim after a patent has been granted.


The patent office could have just missed the prior art, or more likely is that the claims are more narrow than and represent an improvement upon said prior art.




Consider applying for YC's Fall 2025 batch! Applications are open till Aug 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: