Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

The argument might then be that because only a small portion of people will be part of DEI boards, and the people on those boards will tend to be biased a certain way (for the same reasons that most liberal arts professors tend not to be Republican) a certain view is consistently presented and a certain course of action is generally followed that affirms the biases of that group of people. Hence the "grift"; as DEI boards become more powerful, they inevitably force a specific culture on the rest of the group.


The ESG rating group, for instance is a small group of opinionated people with outsized power that can make arbitrary decisions.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: