About what? What evidence is not being considered?
Or… maybe my zealotry is for objectivity. To not using language as a tool to achieve predetermined outcomes.
So, I noticed you didn’t answer the Question about which ad agency it is Tesla uses. Is this the point where you just abandon all pretense, and avoid having a discussion? Instead choosing to evolve into ad hominem and other rhetorical tricks? That’s usually the pattern here, right. The discussion goes into a direction that you can no longer a fan, so instead of admitting any kind of change of opinion based upon new information - like people who are discussing things in good faith do — they simply resort to short quips that divert from the real conversation and allow them to have the final word.
> So, I noticed you didn’t answer the Question about which ad agency it is Tesla uses.
You're only noticing my boredom. Just try to think logically. Your claim is that Tesla can make its own cars but it cannot make its own ads?
> avoid having a discussion?
There is no discussion. There is only your inability to see the obvious.
Tesla's advertising has worked well on you. You've been trained in what to parrot and you parrot it desperately and for free. You like to think of yourself as sophisticated but in reality Tesla's manipulation of you is total. You can't see the obvious even when it's right in front of you.
- What ad agency does Tesla use?
- what networks have they advertised on?
- Multiple people in this thread have pointed out to you the difference between advertising and marketing. Do you still claim they are one and the same?
Finally:
- How to you live with yourself? Don’t you ever get tired of, you know, being you?
Or… maybe my zealotry is for objectivity. To not using language as a tool to achieve predetermined outcomes.
So, I noticed you didn’t answer the Question about which ad agency it is Tesla uses. Is this the point where you just abandon all pretense, and avoid having a discussion? Instead choosing to evolve into ad hominem and other rhetorical tricks? That’s usually the pattern here, right. The discussion goes into a direction that you can no longer a fan, so instead of admitting any kind of change of opinion based upon new information - like people who are discussing things in good faith do — they simply resort to short quips that divert from the real conversation and allow them to have the final word.