That doesn't address my point. Do you really appreciably save on binary footprin... | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

		varjag on March 28, 2022 \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: Fuchsia Workstation That doesn't address my point. Do you really appreciably save on binary footprint simply by using QNX versus trimmed down Linux kernel build?

pjmlp on March 28, 2022 [–]

You mean the binary footprint of a type 1 hypervisor that Linux requires when deployed in the same high integrity computing scenarios that QNX is usually used for?

varjag on March 28, 2022 | [–]

The use case suggested by the GP was IoT/Home Assistant scenarios. So no, I absolutely do not mean that.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact