Doesn't the exchange match people with another person who is buying / selling it? Every single cryptocurrency or video game exchange I have used has settled pretty much instantly.
How hard is decrementing the shares of one user and incrementing the shares of another.
> Doesn't the exchange match people with another person who is buying / selling it? Every single cryptocurrency or video game exchange I have used has settled pretty much instantly.
There are multiple exchanges where stocks are traded, and order routing is typically transparent when using retail brokerages. The exchanges only provide the matching engine, while brokers handle custody. The process of transferring the ownership between brokerages is the clearing step which is handled by the DTCC.
Cryptocurrency exchanges provide both the matching engine and custody, so transferring ownership can be done instantly by updating records in the exchange’s database. The clearing step occurs when transferring coins to another wallet or exchange, when the transaction actually hits the blockchain.
> How hard is decrementing the shares of one user and incrementing the shares of another.
It’s surprisingly difficult. Clearinghouses (centralized) and blockchains (decentralized) exist to solve this very problem.
You can settle as quickly as you want if you’re engaged directly with your counterparty. But yes, T+2 is wildly outdated and will likely move to T+1 in the next few years. Longer term, anything less than same-day settlement both wastes capital (of BDs who need to post collateral while their customers’ trades wait to settle) and risks contagion (since each additional day of settlement gives a party more time to go bankrupt) IMO
> How hard is decrementing the shares of one user and incrementing the shares of another.
whose database are you incrementing/decrementing in? Real life stock trades happen across multiple exchanges with multiple intermediaries (brokers, market makers, end users). Without a blockchain, this is not trivial to coordinate safely
