Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

My biggest complaint with Heroku is that they don't have a database offering between $15/month and $200/month.

This addition to app engine makes them more appealing than heroku at this point.



True, but since they sit on AWS, you can just use Amazon RDS with your Heroku app on a small instance and be just fine.


Which starts around $80/month. There is still a hole there.


but a reserved instance for a year is $227, which is not far from $15 a month.


This is misleading.

The reservation fee for a small instance is $227.50 annually (http://aws.amazon.com/ec2/pricing/) but you still pay an hourly rate to run it, albeit a lower rate than for a non-reserved instance. Running a small reserved instance for a year costs $227.50 + ($0.03 x 24 x 365) => $490.3/year or $40.86/month. (This is in the US East region.)


oops, of course, sorry for this


Thanks, I missed the reserved instances somehow.


The $227 buys you a lower hourly rate, it doesn't buy you use of an instance for a year.


Nothing has been said on pricing yet. It's free while it's still in developer preview.

Pricing will be revealed later. But even if it ends up being a 'mess' like app engine's pricing situation, it should be much easier to move onto another platform.


Cloud SQL is available free of charge for now, and we will publish pricing at least 30 days before charging for it.

Yeah. We know how well that went with GAE.


I'm convinced they were giving it away at a loss before. Now it's priced the same as similar services which makes sense. Obviously it sucked for the people that caught in it, but the expectations are properly set this time around.




Consider applying for YC's Fall 2025 batch! Applications are open till Aug 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: