Prime Minister Magdalena Andersson said this 6 days ago:
> If Russia enters Ukraine, it is assumed that this will lead to large numbers of refugees fleeing the country. Amnesty International warns of a humanitarian catastrophe.
> But Sweden will not be a major recipient country, according to Prime Minister Magdalena Andersson. She believes that the responsibility lies with other countries.
Portugal's prime minister announced a simplified visa programme for any Ukrainian wishing to flee the conflict. If in need, get in touch with the Portuguese embassy in Kiev [1]. It is still staffed.
> Sweden did accept way more refugees during Syria war than any neighbor countries
Yup. And now the Prime Minister has pre-emptively declared that for refugees from a geographically, culturally, and politically much closer country, the gates will be closed. So how does that not support the thesis that Sweden's (Social Democratic / Left / Green / Centre Party) government prefers its asylum seekers to be MENA and Muslim?
> and Sweden simply wish for offloading from neighbor countries.
Funny how that doesn't seem to have been needed between 2015 and now, isn't it? At least I can't recall any other such pre-emptive declarations from that time span. Can you?
> The majority of these refugees were below the age of 20.
The majority of those refugees claimed to be below the age of 20.
> Yup. And now the Prime Minister has pre-emptively declared that for refugees from a geographically, culturally, and politically much closer country, the gates will be closed. So how does that not support the thesis that Sweden's (Social Democratic / Left / Green / Centre Party) government prefers its asylum seekers to be MENA and Muslim?
You are drawing conclusions out of thin air here.
> Funny how that doesn't seem to have been needed between 2015 and now, isn't it? At least I can't recall any other such pre-emptive declarations from that time span. Can you?
What other conflicts between 2015 and now would warrant that amount of refugees in our part of the world?
> The majority of those refugees claimed to be below the age of 20.
Again you are drawing conclusions out of thin air.
>> Yup. And now the Prime Minister has pre-emptively declared that for refugees from a geographically, culturally, and politically much closer country, the gates will be closed. So how does that not support the thesis that Sweden's (Social Democratic / Left / Green / Centre Party) government prefers its asylum seekers to be MENA and Muslim?
> You are drawing conclusions out of thin air here.
No. My hypothesis fits the available facts. The only thing drawn out of thin air here is your claim that mine is.
You "forgot" to answer how the available facts wouldn't fit with my hypothesis. But, we all know why you skipped that: Because you can't, because they do.
Prime Minister Magdalena Andersson said this 6 days ago:
> If Russia enters Ukraine, it is assumed that this will lead to large numbers of refugees fleeing the country. Amnesty International warns of a humanitarian catastrophe.
> But Sweden will not be a major recipient country, according to Prime Minister Magdalena Andersson. She believes that the responsibility lies with other countries.
https://www.dn.se/varlden/magdalena-andersson-andra-lander-f...