> An informal agreement between you and your circle of friends and family is not a legally-binding agreement
You’re right, it’s much deeper and more significant than laws (which are broken literally every day).
> A modern economy needs private contracts that are fully enforceable by courts of justice, it cannot rely on informal agreements like this
That may be what an economy needs, but what a society, culture, or civilization needs is the deep bonds of human relationships. Those things are built on families.
> I don't think anyone wants to become custodians of someone else's on-line accounts, even if they are your friends.
Have you ever helped your friends or family? Have you ever been helped by them?
I find this a necessary question to ask because the only people that critique this idea are those that do not have any real friends or family. And to be fair, I already addressed that in my original comment (there will be services / companies to help people in that situation).
You’re right, it’s much deeper and more significant than laws (which are broken literally every day).
> A modern economy needs private contracts that are fully enforceable by courts of justice, it cannot rely on informal agreements like this
That may be what an economy needs, but what a society, culture, or civilization needs is the deep bonds of human relationships. Those things are built on families.
> I don't think anyone wants to become custodians of someone else's on-line accounts, even if they are your friends.
Have you ever helped your friends or family? Have you ever been helped by them?
I find this a necessary question to ask because the only people that critique this idea are those that do not have any real friends or family. And to be fair, I already addressed that in my original comment (there will be services / companies to help people in that situation).