While the study does show that pregnancy tests in 1993 were very inaccurate, there is nothing in the study that suggests the inaccuracy was due to people having problems interpreting the result of the test. They are only hypothesizing about reasons for the inaccuracy, and they think that the biggest factor is that women did not wait long enough, which is pretty much what I said.
I strongly doubt that these computer based tests are in any way better than analog tests, especially since the electronics just add another potential point of failure, and they do nothing to address all the other issues with pregnancy tests.
While the study does show that pregnancy tests in 1993 were very inaccurate, there is nothing in the study that suggests the inaccuracy was due to people having problems interpreting the result of the test. They are only hypothesizing about reasons for the inaccuracy, and they think that the biggest factor is that women did not wait long enough, which is pretty much what I said.
I strongly doubt that these computer based tests are in any way better than analog tests, especially since the electronics just add another potential point of failure, and they do nothing to address all the other issues with pregnancy tests.