If you're saying "political censorship" is the only form of censorship that matters - it's debatable in the same way flat earth arguments are debatable.
Follow up clarification: If your argument is "corporate censorship is benign when compared to political censorship" then I concede that is very debatable indeed.
Example - A news station refusing to publish stories that involves their parent or a sibling company is a common one.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religious_censorship Religious censorship is another well understood form.
If you're saying "political censorship" is the only form of censorship that matters - it's debatable in the same way flat earth arguments are debatable.