No, it most certainly is censorship. It is also business. Those two things aren't mutually exclusive. I'd also note that it is completely legal, but that I (personally) think that such practices are harmful.
> shout at the manager of a shoe store for not selling books?
A shoe store? That's not a good analogy. I wouldn't complain that Spotify doesn't offer downloads of popular software, would I?
Would people complain if Barnes & Noble suddenly pulled a number of "controversial" books from their shelves after public outcry?
No, it most certainly is censorship. It is also business. Those two things aren't mutually exclusive. I'd also note that it is completely legal, but that I (personally) think that such practices are harmful.
> shout at the manager of a shoe store for not selling books?
A shoe store? That's not a good analogy. I wouldn't complain that Spotify doesn't offer downloads of popular software, would I?
Would people complain if Barnes & Noble suddenly pulled a number of "controversial" books from their shelves after public outcry?