Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Same in Tunisia. Remote and France have swooped practically most of the tech talent. You are forced with either mediocre developers or to pay EU rates.


Shouldn't mediocre be generally acceptable? It seems unreal to expect the majority to be above average.


My experience is mediocre is insufficient in SW preojects. You NEED some good technical pillars, else it will all be shit.


Then 75% of software is shit?


Yes.


This feels like a gross over exaggeration.


Sturgeon's Law, 90% of everything is shit


Isn't that law basically saying that absolutes aren't 100% accurate?


No. It's saying exactly what it sounds like, that most of everything is at a very low level of quality.

Historically, it was a response to the argument that science fiction was a genre that didn't deserve to have any attention paid to it, because look how awful some science fiction books were. Sturgeon's response was that most science fiction books were terrible for the same reason that most work in every other genre, past, present, or future, is terrible.



Did you read your link?

> Sturgeon's law (or Sturgeon's revelation) is an adage stating "ninety percent of everything is crap."

> Sturgeon deemed Sturgeon's law to mean "nothing is always absolutely so" in the story "The Claustrophile" in a 1956 issue of Galaxy. The second adage, variously rendered as "ninety percent of everything is crud" or "ninety percent of everything is crap", was known as "Sturgeon's Revelation", formulated as such in his book review column for Venture in 1957. However, almost all modern uses of the term Sturgeon's law refer to the second, including the definition listed in the Oxford English Dictionary.


Yep.

"Sturgeon deemed Sturgeon's law to mean "nothing is always absolutely so" in the story "The Claustrophile" in a 1956 issue of Galaxy. The second adage, variously rendered as "ninety percent of everything is crud" or "ninety percent of everything is crap", was known as "Sturgeon's Revelation","

Not to mention, it's not a scientific law, but just an adage. Even then, when there's a higher barrier to entry the law is thought not to apply (such as technical skills required to create professional software).


Problem is, if you are outsourcing remotely, you want someone who is quite competent for him to be able to work on his own and pick up on the lack of face to face meetings. Mediocre as a result will give less than mediocre results or no results.


Or there's a need for communication. It doesn't matter if the person is "quite competent" if they're on their own building something that doesn't fit the requirements. An average dev shouldn't have any issue being able to Google the occasional problem. The vast majority of the issue we have with outsourced work is subpar English communication.


> Or there's a need for communication.

> the issue we have with outsourced work is subpar English communication.

If you have good English command, you are already worth something on the Internet. Also, someone not from an English speaking country will need to pick up English by himself and practice frequently.


I'm not worth anything.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: