Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Naive Q: what makes Ariane 5 better than Falcon 9/Heavy here?



Falcon 9 does not have enough capacity; the JWST is too heavy for it to launch all the way to L2. So F9 is out.

Falcon Heavy does have enough capacity, but:

1. It was not really available for bookings when the JWST mission was planned and

2. even if NASA could choose again today, Ariane 5 has a track record of 106 successes out of 111 launches (107 out of 112 now I guess) and Falcon Heavy is still relatively untested with only 3 launches (all of which were successful, but still only 3). For something super critical you might want to go with old but dependable technology over the newest hotness.


Falcon didn’t exist when the choice was made, which makes Ariane automatically better.


Its track record is almost perfect


It existed and was already a reliable launch vehicle when the project was being designed and constructed.


80 something flawless launches in a row




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: