Agreed on the 90% unit test coverage. I'm all for high test coverage, but I care more about having solid assertions. Too often I see test that are expecting an error, but not the error it's getting.
Major business rules need tests too, but they are much harder to write - so we get high unit test coverage and not hard conversations about test quality.
Major business rules need tests too, but they are much harder to write - so we get high unit test coverage and not hard conversations about test quality.