Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Actually I've been doing it about a decade. Long enough to have had to make the judgement call to not change our site to fix performance regressions on Firefox because there weren't enough users to justify the cost a couple times.

It's okay; FF unbroke themselves in 2 revisions anyway. But if it'd been Chrome, fixing the site would have been our top priority.



Ah, fair enough! Yeah, it might not be perfect, but I don't think it's bad enough to make a mono/duopoly the better option.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: