Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

From an ethical standpoint, any code that amplifies and profits from radical speech should be fair game for release. If employees or hackers feel the need to release info in that regard, so be it. This is the risk defined in such models and should be mitigated accordingly.


Who decides what speech is radical enough to compromise the privacy of users?

And if speech is "radical" meaning to the point of illegality, shouldn't the legal system decide, rather than the court of public opinion?


Radical as in pushed to the extremes, not radical in thought to the general population. See https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rE3j_RHkqJc&t=1s

That I've been DONT MENTION ARROWS ON HN on this post is a good indication we're not close to solving this by a long shot.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: