Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Yes, but that may be nitpicking. The salient part is if it is a get rich quick scheme based on convincing people to join.


I know I'm a hopelessly naive hippy, but isn't there some option where we make our case by saying things that are true, rather than saying things that are untrue but alarming in the right direction? I feel like I personally would find online discourse much more helpful if we could do that.


Yes. Words matter, and accuracy is important. I'm still dirty on "literally" being rebranded to mean "figuratively".


Okay here we go. Call it a crypto scheme. Now someone else create the wikipedia article I did my part...




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: