Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

[flagged]



The subreddit was called /r/fatpeoplehate. That's not anti-obesity, that's anti-'obese people'


Everyone moved to telegram. They host your "offensive" memes and chats, they dont care. Right-wing, left-wing whatever you can post it there.

You cant call for violence or show violence, like gore content and terrorist videos do get removed. Everything else is fine (for now).

Download the app from the website not form the stores to avoid googles censorship.


How long would telegram keep that reputation? They will succumb to pressure one day.


Telegram has been succumbing to the pressure left and right for years now, from US and EU to Iran and Russia. Don't worry, it will always manage and find the compromise between its PR bullshit and corporate and state level requirements.

I can't even imagine how many secret services monitor what's going on right on Telegram servers.


hurr durr [insert basic telegram hate here] hurr durr


I don't hate it, I've said it was a hoax since the first presentation (which was… drum roll… about rolling their own crypto — soon found to be accidentally or intentionally broken). You had to be mad to believe that literal Russian Zuckerberg, who had been known for behind-the-scenes compliance while keeping the facade of uncompromising struggle for freedom, was caring about you and your privacy.

I doubt that anyone can have any trust in “secure” and “private” communication service that got banned in Iran only to be unbanned 3 days later. They were not so soft on other big names they banned. The outcome? Telegram is the most popular messaging app in Iran, and no one is searching for anything better. Perfect place to oversee the public.


Complete nonsense, all of it and completely irrelevant if used as an alternative to reddit none of that crypto/security/privacy nonsense maters at all. You have zero of that on reddit or FB or any other social media and its completely useless anyway for public communities who aren't trying to do anything illegal.

The thread is about a place where your "offensive" community can be hosted without the owner overlords coming an declare it a hate-group, in case you missed that.


Given many past examples, it's only until “public demands” to get it removed.


Doesn't matter, people want a solution now and no one expects it to be forever. The user who asked is unlikely to waste time in such a community in 10 years anyway.


Maybe, but nonetheless OP is looking for a palace NOW and since it lasted for 8 years it may as well last for another few.


When the group was on reddit, I liked it because it was laser-focused. The moderators didn't tolerate racism, anti-LGBTQ+ rhetoric, antisemitism, sexism, etc.

On these other platforms, the users seem to think that, in the name of "free speech" everything is allowed everywhere. So on other platforms that tried to host it, it's full of off-topic posts. The don't respect the rights of a group of people to carve out an area for themselves.

Someone just needs to launch it on their own website, and hope the ISP doesn't pull it, or the DNS provider doesn't refuse to resolve it, etc.


Telegram is just like reddit in this regards. Its up to the user to make and enforce content rules in a closed community. If you want a channel/group with only very specific content then make it somewhat hard for stupid people to gain write permission and have a bunch of volunteer checking the content submitted. Every other platform would require similar strategies to get what you want.

The existence of other groups/channels on telegram with other rules is completely irrelevant. If people are unable to switch between communities and respect the different rules in each then that's their problem and you just remove them.


So you wanted to only hate one specific group, and you don't like it when people hate other groups as well.

Maybe you need to sit down and think about if that is entirely consistent.


That is because it was, in fact, a hate group, not an "anti-obesity" group.


Ok, I get it. You're against free speech.

But the point stands--it's difficult to find a place to host a forum that contains legal discussions that happen to offend the sensibilities of the type of people who run tech companies.


> Ok, I get it. You're against free speech.

Another day, another person confusing 'free speech' with a private publisher not wanting to publish hate speech.

You're entitled to print what you want, you're not entitled to force someone else to print anything.


>>you're not entitled to force someone else to print anything.

Unless you're the surgeon general. Then you can force private companies to publish compelled speech on their alcohol and tobacco products.


That was a very acceptable tradeoff for the makers of those products - I'm pretty sure they're rather print reasonable warnings than just have their products, which are indisputably health hazards, banned entirely.


No one is printing anything.


Yeah, because you're perfectly willing to accept that your "free speech!" can't compel someone else to operate their printing press for you... But a server on the Internet is such a totally different thing, for sure!

IOW: This ancient figure of speech is used precisely to show that the issue is exactly the same old one that has been thoroughly hashed out for centuries.


Would you like to try that again?


No, thanks, I'm good and done.


I said was I couldn’t find another place that would host it. I didn’t say that Reddit didn’t have a right to remove it.


The Dixie Chicks, the PMRC, and a host of other examples show this isn't a new phenomenon.


You can't find a hosting provider for an anti-obesity forum? I would think there are all types of servers you could find.


It might be because it is not actually an "anti-obesity forum" but actually a hate group that was kicked out for good reason.


No, I am against hate groups. They are the absolute worst of humanity, they destroy people, and they destroy societies.

Do not participate in them. Do not support them. Do everything you can to oppose them.


That's interesting. Can you elaborate on what this "anti-obesity" forum was like? How was it different from a hate group?


Well, it was named "fatpeoplehate", which is a tiny little bit of a giveaway. Funny the original poster forgot to mention that detail, I wonder why.


Maybe they meant a different anti-obesity forum.


No other one matches the details given. Also, OP pretty much confirmed it.


Well, /r/fatpeoplehate was definitely a hate group. I wonder why they would go around claiming it wasn't.


Nobody ever thinks they are in a hate group.


I’d bet you and I both would agree that we don’t like people who recklessly put themselves in a situation where they are at extreme risk to catch or spread COVID. If we were to have a forum that criticized people who won’t vaccinate, won’t distance, won’t wear protective masks, and promote unproven treatments would that be a “hate group?”


Yes. I visited /r/hermancainaward the other day becsuse I wanted to check it out, and I was stunned at how hateful the comments were against people who, sadly, had opinions that lead to their death.

I was sad that people could be so misinformed/misled, but the subreddit seemed genuinely happy that these people died. That sounds very much like a hate group to me, and I'd like to see it as banned as fatpeoplehate (which has hate in the damn name) was.

It's not about the subject of the criticism, it's how you go about it. These subreddit are toxic hate-pools, they aren't a force for good. They're reveling in the misfortune of others instead of trying to somehow help, and that's what makes them hate groups, not whether or not being fat or an antivaxxer is bad.


> I was stunned at how hateful the comments were against people who, sadly, had opinions that lead to their death.

And yet Reddit management is ok with it.


Reddit management is fine with literally anything as long as it does not give them bad press.


For now.


>instead of trying to somehow help

The most popular winners of the hermancainaward that you're lamenting the loss of are the kinds of people who would aggressively decline such help, and probably shout at you for offering it.

You may call me a bad person, but I was quietly hoping that Trump died from the pandemic he exacerbated and Bezos' rocket exploded in a blaze of justice. Those people wouldn't shed a tear for you or your family, why would you for them?

There's way too many people on this planet as it is, a couple less loud selfish drains on society wouldn't be too unfortunate.


But that's not justice. It's just... hate.


I couldn't think of the best word to use. Actually poetic justice is what I was looking for.

Karma's probably pretty close to what I mean - for all the workers peeing in bottles toiling in his salt mines, and everybody's cumulative suffering because of the taxes he never paid.

Just because he's been involved in corrupting the system so much that those taxes aren't even demanded doesn't mean he gets out of a karmic obligation to all the people who's work he's built his incredibly narcissistic and tone-deaf space joyride empire on.

Imagine you're in a small tribe on a desert island with limited resources.

Do you think Mr hog-absolutely-everything-so-I-can-joyride-a-giant-dick-that-others-designed-for-me-into-what-can-only-just-be-technically-called-space-so-I-can-now-cringeworthily-call-myself-an-astronaut-without-having-any-actual-skills would be popular in the tribe, or not?

Well, we're all part of a larger tribe on a slightly bigger island with limited resources, and I have some ideas on who I wouldn't mind being seen thrown into the volcano.

And all the more satisfying if there's the added poetic justice of them falling into the volcano themselves because of their own incredibly loud stupidity. So call me a hater if you like.


> So call me a hater if you like.

I'd probably call it tribalism? 20th century had quite a lot of poorer people killing richer people in the name of same.


Yes, I'm in the 99.999999% population tribe.

The billionaires are clearly a hostile, rival tribe stealing our resources.


No, tribalistic thinking should go the way of the dodo. There's no "us".

There are just people, who can be convinced to do unspeakable things by media over a long period gradually activating their vestigial tribalism.


[flagged]


You see proved my point.

One man's hate group is another man's valuable discussion forum. Mocking people who won't take precautions against COVID is perfectly OK! Mocking people who won't take precautions against eating too much food is "hate."


FPH actively went after individuals who could be easily identified. And they weren't content to keep their opinions in their own sub. Instead they would pop up regularly in completely unrelated discussions. They also had a culture of harassment.

They made themselves rather unpopular. If they had stuck to their own sub, made an effort to hide the identities of their targets, and mostly just said: "boy, I really hate fat people. So disgusting", then they'd probably still be around today.

Those are some key differences between FPH and HCA. Not to mention HCA is a response to the ongoing pandemic. While fatness isn't contagious. The obese are only hurting themselves.


Obesity isn't contagious so these things aren't remotely comparable.

It was just a hate group, stop digging man.


> It was just a hate group, stop digging man

I like your ironic username.




Consider applying for YC's Fall 2025 batch! Applications are open till Aug 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: