Are they? I can't go to Wikipedia for explanation of 'poetry, literature, [...] political speeches, legal texts, science papers' aside from really famous and specific examples (such as 'the Bible' which I omitted in quoting).
Even the entry 'On Computable Numbers[ with an application to the Entscheidungsproblem]' for example, redirects to its entry in a list. [0]
where the entire annotation, as it were, is:
> Description: This article set the limits of computer science. It defined the Turing Machine, a model for all computations. On the other hand, it proved the undecidability of the halting problem and Entscheidungsproblem and by doing so found the limits of possible computation.
As I alluded to in a sibling comment to yours, [1] the potential as I see it would be something more like (a less thorough version of) Petzold's The Annotated Turing - line by line annotations of the actual paper, explaining anything non-trivial the reader might want to hover-over.
I'd love to read more academic output, and I honestly think I would if there were an easier Genius/Petzold-style way to be taught the bits I'm missing as I work through it. To my regret I didn't stay for a PhD; I don't have a supervisor to nag or whom who can guide me through easy to harder to grok works.
Even the entry 'On Computable Numbers[ with an application to the Entscheidungsproblem]' for example, redirects to its entry in a list. [0]
where the entire annotation, as it were, is:
> Description: This article set the limits of computer science. It defined the Turing Machine, a model for all computations. On the other hand, it proved the undecidability of the halting problem and Entscheidungsproblem and by doing so found the limits of possible computation.
As I alluded to in a sibling comment to yours, [1] the potential as I see it would be something more like (a less thorough version of) Petzold's The Annotated Turing - line by line annotations of the actual paper, explaining anything non-trivial the reader might want to hover-over.
I'd love to read more academic output, and I honestly think I would if there were an easier Genius/Petzold-style way to be taught the bits I'm missing as I work through it. To my regret I didn't stay for a PhD; I don't have a supervisor to nag or whom who can guide me through easy to harder to grok works.
[0]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_important_publications...
[1]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28551572