It is amusing to see this behavior, considering the comment is a question, to which responses seem to favor answer "no".
The only part of the comment, that is actually a statement about peer review in mathematics being as bad or even worse in terms of assessing correctness, than reviewing large code changes. And nobody argues against that.
It is amusing to see this behavior, considering the comment is a question, to which responses seem to favor answer "no".
The only part of the comment, that is actually a statement about peer review in mathematics being as bad or even worse in terms of assessing correctness, than reviewing large code changes. And nobody argues against that.