Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

As much as I hate to admit it, "ego" has driven so much innovation in space that it was probably inevitable that something like this would happen.


We used to have smart guys in competition. Edison vs. Tesla.

Not we have rich business savy guys with not much of a science background holding the cards.

I have met very few wealthy men, young or old, who had great ideas. It's almost like the money dulls their brains? And their vanity projects are usually way out of their wheelhouse.

It's the same with Writers. I have read very few wealthy guys shop could write. They certainly have the time to write, but it's dribble. They are only read because they have money.


Apparently Edison was much more of a businessman than his legacy suggests - which was intentional on his part. Similar to Bill Gates, they both started as engineers but made their money organizing people.

See https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2019/10/28/the-real-natur...


That's because Edison vs. Tesla was really mostly theoretical with some funds for engineering (and marketing). The space race is really mostly engineering which requires lots of money.


Edison wasn't a smart guy. He hired smart guys and didn't give them credit for their inventions, while trying to talk to the dead.


Sounds exactly like at least a pair of these attention-seeking billionaires who rant about technology and engineering.


Not really a competition. Comparing Tesla to Edison is like comparing Virgin Galactic to SpaceX.


The egos of the rich fuel the engine of civilization, and the blood of the poor grease its wheels.


I think it's a bigger category: the egos of the powerful. The rich are a subset.


That's a bit of a tautology isn't it?


I can't think of anyone powerful enough who isn't also rich. Although "rich" is a vaguely defined term. There still to me seems to be a direct relationship between money and power - billionaires can push the world further than millionaires, than the upper class, etc.


Money and power are two sides of the same coin. Money is literally the unit of measure for power over other people - to the first approximation, a dollar in hand means you can make appropriate people do a dollar's worth of arbitrary work for you.

The more money you have, the more you have of this kind of power mediated by economy. You can, in particular, use this power to have politicians do work for you (many ways of doing this are perfectly legal). Conversely, political power - the kind mediated by legal systems or explicit threats of violence - is directly convertible to money.

(There's also a special variant of the latter - power wielded by organized religions. The power to browbeat others into doing almost any arbitrary work. Of course, that one too is trivially convertible to both money and political power, and vice versa. That's why fully separating business, church and state is fundamentally impossible. They're different facets of the same thing. An Unholy Trinity.)


Rich is how much money you own.

Power is how much money you control.

They’re not as closely linked as you think.

A managing partner of a $1B fund is more powerful than a person worth $10B on paper whose wealth is all tied up in a minority position in a company they are unable to sell the shares of.

Or consider the power of Biden vs his personal net worth.


That's why being worth something on paper is not the same thing as money.




Consider applying for YC's Winter 2026 batch! Applications are open till Nov 10

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: