Exactly. Someone might have their leg amputated and complain for a while, then eventually accept it and adapt. This does not mean that having a leg amputated is a good thing.

That's not a fair analogy.

The alternative to not having your leg amputated in given example is likely eventual spreading of a disease and death.

With consumer goods and services often no one forces you to have to accept their changes.

No one forces you to use touch screen phones: there are plenty of alternatives which do include a keyboard.

Even if you don't like one input box does all approach, you can use previous browsers or browsers which retain the standard model.

If you don't like Netflix's price hikes, you can just use another service or don't subscribe at all. Your life won't decline because of it.

Not in every case. I want to use firefox because of some plugins. There is pretty much no alternative for them. Given that is was the best choice so far, I get to choose again between something that doesn't do stuff I need, or something that doesn't look the way I'm used to. Staying with previous versions is never an answer due to lack of bugfixes, security updates, etc.

Same mistake ubuntu does sometimes. It's the best in general, but has more and more really annoying changes in my opinion.

You cannot "just switch" in many cases. In some other you'll have to choose between two things you don't like the least. That's not a good outcome.