This kind of sarcastic and emotionally charged comment is not particularly helpful. The fact that a comment by someone you disagree with bears some semblance to a shallow and partisan comic you once read does not constitute meaningful engagement.
In what way? It makes sense to me: the person causing a lot of collateral damage (in the form of women and children) in pursuit of their target is calling the target a monster. The target didn't kill anyone, but the person chasing them behaves as though the murders they themselves have committed are somehow the fault of the person they're trying to kill.
It's like, imagine you catch someone breaking your car window to steal your car radio, and you say "hey, you broke my window!" but they retort "you made me break your window by locking your doors!".
It is well known that various freedom fighter / terrorist groups are not just protecting their women and children / taking women and children to the hospital and then getting attacked. These cells have long terms presence in those places. They are firing rockets from the rooftops of schools and hospitals. Like with that building in Palestine that the IDF drone-struck that the AP worked out of but apparently Hamas did too and this was a known quantity.
